First-science concerns itself with the most fundamental questions and answers. First-science functions by subverting itself. What are the fundamental questions and answers that other questions and answers are built on? This is a question for first-science. Psychology seems like a first-science, because the mind is the source of first-science in the first place. Linguistic philosophy (in the broadest sense) seems like a first-science, for both psychology, first-science, and linguistic philosophy are made of sentences. But all of these develop over time, in human history. Are history and/or historicism first-science? A question for first-science.
Is first-science a bottomless pit?
Philosophy / Illiterature / Comedy
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(65)
-
▼
February
(24)
- Scab Mask Sore
- Fail better
- Questionable Questions
- First-science
- The "as" is the face of the soul.
- Winning Smile
- Beckett's Worstwar Ho
- 93% Fool
- Truth Comes In Spurts
- Water On Fire
- Truth in Painting
- An Inventor, not a Scientist
- Philosophy is erotic as religion is erotic. I sugg...
- Metaphorical Animal
- New Not True
- He would name his protagonist "He."
- World-Historical Greatness
- Footnotes are Holy Water
- Sentences are Viruses
- Self-consciously self-conscious
- The face of stasis. The face of serenity. Find it...
- Richard Rorty
- Mark Ryden
- No title
-
▼
February
(24)