I think that any intellectual position is vulnerable to potent questioning. Do we stop questioning because our current position is emotionally satisfying? Are all intellectual positions based on a sort of faith? On the cessation of questioning?
Is the "pursuit of truth" a bluff, then? Is "truth" just adjustment? Is ultimate truth possible at all? What is my motive for asking these questions? If you have an answer to this question of my motive, what is the motive behind your answer?
Do we want truth or only the prestige associated with it?
If we propose a concept or model of the psyche, how do we know that this concept or model is not the result of wishful thinking, a rationalization?
Is all reason really rationalization? But then reason as rationalization would be a rationalization. Can the snake swallow itself tail-first?
Philosophy / Illiterature / Comedy
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(65)
-
▼
February
(24)
- Scab Mask Sore
- Fail better
- Questionable Questions
- First-science
- The "as" is the face of the soul.
- Winning Smile
- Beckett's Worstwar Ho
- 93% Fool
- Truth Comes In Spurts
- Water On Fire
- Truth in Painting
- An Inventor, not a Scientist
- Philosophy is erotic as religion is erotic. I sugg...
- Metaphorical Animal
- New Not True
- He would name his protagonist "He."
- World-Historical Greatness
- Footnotes are Holy Water
- Sentences are Viruses
- Self-consciously self-conscious
- The face of stasis. The face of serenity. Find it...
- Richard Rorty
- Mark Ryden
- No title
-
▼
February
(24)